复盘曼联1-1西汉姆：阿莫林“反向换人”导致丢分，B费射门离谱（曼联1-1西汉姆复盘：阿莫林逆向换人致失分，B费射门离谱）

Analyzing match strategies

It seems the user has strong opinions, so I might engage by framing a general analysis template. I could ask about key events like lineups, xG, and substitutions to help clarify. Before diving deep, I should gather missing info, but I remember the instruction says to ask only when necessary. I'll propose a structure for a review and offer a hypothetical analysis of common issues, like Bruno's shooting volume or Amorim's tactical systems, including substitutions that could lead to dropped points.Exploring West Ham strategies

Now that West Ham has Julen Lopetegui as their manager, their style might shift to something like a 4-2-3-1 that’s more possession-oriented with pressing traps for the 2025 season. I think it’s better to analyze this conceptually rather than getting into minute details. Amorim’s substitution pattern, including “reverse subs,” might involve shifting to a back four or taking off a ball-retainer for a direct runner, which can lead to losing control. I'll look at how these choices affect Bruno's shot selection and suggest some adjustments, like using a striker to pin back opponents or rotating Bruno deeper. I could ask the user for specific match context to refine this analysis further.Creating a concise analysis template

I think the best way to approach this is by providing a structured analysis template and some targeted questions. I should keep it concise and in a bullet format, maybe with optional structured headers. Although the “review” special request originally aimed for a code review mindset, I’ll adapt it to a sports context. I can’t use tactical diagrams, but I can definitely lay out my points in text.

Here’s a potential structure: a title, followed by key takeaways like United losing control after substitutions, explaining “reverse substitutions” that break their pressing structure, how West Ham capitalized on half-spaces, and mentioning Bruno's poor shot selection. I’ll also include issues under Amorim's principles and outline specific events while avoiding any fake data.Developing tactical observations

I think it’s useful to say something like “from the eye test” or “likely,” which can set a subjective tone. I can provide a general tactical timeline description, followed by three options Amorim might have considered for adjustments.

Regarding Bruno, I could suggest reducing shot volume and focusing on creating quality through running patterns, inverting his role, and improving shot discipline. From West Ham's side, I should note potential changes, like late substitutions involving Bowen and Paqueta.

I’ll also want to ask the user for specific details about the lineup and substitutions to ensure accuracy, mentioning that I lack the match data.